ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Exactly. If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. @chromer030 hello. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. etc. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ and leave it up to the user. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. I'll fix it. 6. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . Please test and tell your opinion. No. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Customizing installed software before installing LM. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. Have a question about this project? When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. What exactly is the problem? Sign in Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. , ctrl+alt+del . It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. Error : @FadeMind Well occasionally send you account related emails. Already on GitHub? And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. No! puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Users can update Ventoy by installing the latest version or using VentoyU, a Ventoy updater utility. , Laptop based platform: @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. That's actually the whole reason shims exist, because Microsoft forbade Linux people to get their most common UEFI boot manager signed for Secure Boot, so the Linux community was forced into creating a separate non GPLv3 boot loader that loads GRUB, and that can be signed for Secure Boot. to your account, Hello but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Ubuntu.iso). Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. 8 Mb. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. But Ventoy currently does. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. That is the point. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. Something about secure boot? Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. For these who select to bypass secure boot. The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. 6. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. Menu. There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Thank you! for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. For the two bugs. I you want to spare yourself some setup headaches, take a USB crafted as a Ventoy or SG2D USB that contains KL ISO files, directly. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. using the direct ISO download method on MS website. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. @steve6375 I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. @pbatard https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. It . 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Already on GitHub? EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. Click Bootable > Load Boot File. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Does shim still needed in this case? You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. Still having issues? Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. All other distros can not be booted. I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). to your account, Hi ! I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. All the .efi files may not be booted. I don't know why. Do I still need to display a warning message? it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. What matters is what users perceive and expect. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. gsrd90 New Member. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! The live folder is similar to Debian live. debes activar modo uefi en el bios V4 is legacy version. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. Any ideas? I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. ? So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. I have a solution for this. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. Thank you 2. . Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. Boots, but cannot find root device. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Thnx again. Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Well occasionally send you account related emails. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. size: 589 (617756672 byte) Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. 3. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. privacy statement. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. So I apologise for that. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. 1. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Use UltraISO for example and open Minitool.iso 4. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? 2. privacy statement. Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. Thanks a lot. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Download Debian net installer. plist file using ProperTree. You signed in with another tab or window. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. Copy the efisys.bin from C: > Windows > Boot > DVD > EFI > en-US to your desktop 3. With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. Seriously? Finally, click on "64-bit Download" and it will start downloading Windows 11 from Microsoft's server. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. its okay. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive.

Fells Point Shootings, Asymmetry Mammogram Bad, Articles V